Player contract saga – SLC an incompetent employer guided by forces with ulterior motives?

Some blog posts contain unedited fan-submitted content — Create an account to start your own blog

The current Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) administrators have repeatedly claimed that modern day cricket has changed so much since the 90s, that it has to be treated as a business if Sri Lanka is to keep pace with the fast changing dynamics within global cricket. The thought of mixing cricket with money is something that those who played the game for nothing more than the honour and glory of representing the country struggle to accept. However, even some of those critiques have come to acknowledge that today’s “professional cricket” needs to be managed with a business focus, if we are to ensure that SLC maximizes the value of their precious resource, their best cricketers. A growing number of Sri Lankan cricket fans have accepted the cricket board’s claim that cricket needs to be run like a business, but only with the hope and trust that it is run like a ‘good business’, by an efficient and competent employer who is guided by a board of directors (BOD) who have nothing but the best interest of Sri Lanka cricket at heart.

Unfortunately for the fans, SLC has proven to be nothing more than a perfect example of an incompetent employer, guided by a BOD (political powers that guide it) with ulterior motives. Going by the financial results of SLC over the past few years, especially since the 2010 World Cup, it is beyond any reasonable doubt that cricket administrators have failed the country, their stockholders. This business of Sri Lanka cricket has only been kept alive by government (who is pretty much the BOD guiding SLC) bailouts funded by public money. Guided by a BOD who have manipulated the sport to promote their political and financial motives, the executives have engaged in questionable and wasteful activities (enough has already been mentioned on this topic that we will not need to go in to detail) that have driven SLC to financial turmoil. To further highlight the severity of mismanagement, all of this financial failures have come at a time when Sri Lanka’s cricketers have enjoyed one of the most successful periods in international cricket, if not the most successful period ever. Imagine a corporation like Apple losing money and facing bankruptcy at a time when their products have made them a market leader and are seeing the greatest demand ever? That could most likely have happened only if the company was poorly managed and not because of their products. In reality, with a well-run company like Apple, this scenario surely would never have taken place. Apple’s BOD would have acted immediately if there was even the hint of mismanagement by executives.

In Sri Lanka, we now have a situation similar to the hypothetical scenario we discussed with respect to Apple. Our cricketers have been making it to the final of every prestigious ICC limited overs events. Our team, even after the retirements of legends like Murali, Vass, Marvan and Sanath, have remained competitive in Test cricket as well, including wins in South Africa and against then number-one England. Yet, our cricket board is in financial turmoil. The difference in this real life scenario facing our cricket and the hypothetical Apple scenario is that the BOD seems to have done little, if anything, to address the incompetent management. Perhaps the lack of action is a result of the unwillingness to publicly acknowledge failure and punish those who are responsible. Unless you are part of SLC, there is no denying the fact that SLC is in financial turmoil. When initially taking office, the current SLC president admitted to the gravity of the situation and also explained it will take at least five years to turn things around. However, he has changed his outlook now and like the sports minister, wants us to believe that it is just a few outstanding loans that are the only blemish on their financials.

The current contract dispute does little to hide the obvious, that SLC is in deep trouble. What is in the best interest of Sri Lanka cricket right now is for everyone involved to stop pointing fingers at each other and focus on doing what is best for SLC's future. This includes players making some compromises as well, even though most of this isn’t their fault. However, if we are to expect players to make compromises, then the first thing that needs to happen is that the BOD show the country that they are also making the necessary changes at the administrative end as well. In arguing their case for disputed contract clauses, SLC points out that they could only afford to compensate players according to ‘Sri Lankan standards’. Yet what had not been made clear is what SLC’s administrators are doing to change their failed methods of managing SLC or the board (sports minister and other political influences to be specific) is doing about failed administrators. This same group of administrators only recently paid millions to have a foreigner tell them how to run local cricket, only to turn around and make a mockery of it by doing the exact opposite of what was recommended by that consultant (i.e. appointment of politicians to high profile positions within SLC). They have added new coaching staff (not replaced) at salaries certainly not reflective of ‘Sri Lankan standards’. The same individuals who were part of administrations that have crippled SLC are elected to the same positions uncontested. So much for democracy! The same administrators who fired the team manager, stating that they intend on utilising paid selectors to also double as manager, have now replaced the position, rumoured to be at a higher salary. These same administrators also introduced two ‘paid selectors’ at salaries surely above ‘Sri Lankan standards’. These same administrators were also successful in selling local TV rights to a company owned by well-connected individuals at a price that was well below what SLC could have earned.

In order to get the best out of our cricketers, SLC should pave a middle ground that both SLC and the players can walk without conflict. That middle ground needed to have been paved with both sides making honest attempts to work towards what is best for SLC. With their latest actions, SLC seems to want players to make all of the compromises, but have not come out with anything to indicate how they, SLC, plan to lead by example. There is absolutely no doubt, players should compromise on some of the items being disputed. But without SLC or their BOD showing any reasonable attempt to clean up how the business is run, the latest resolution is only a ceasefire temporarily delaying an ugly collision!


Ranjan Rodrigo's picture
Member since:
8 January 2012
Last activity:
1 year 27 weeks

You are certainly worth more than 2 cts worth.What a super blog. The players have to make sacrifices but if they do, what sacricifices is SLC doing?
Can SLC explain
1) Why 2 paid selectors? As a selector they get enough extras and SL where all club matches are played within 10 km, why cant they move around?
2) Marvan has secretly been made an Assistant coach when as batting coach he did sweet buggerall.Hehas on the sly created havoc.
3)Arunasiri was sent to Australia for 58 days and it cost SLC Rs 3 million.
4) Nishantha has gone on over 35 trips and no explanations.
5) 2 new stadiums were built when unnecessary.
6) Is SLC a one man show and others only make numbers.
7) Is it not incompetence that so many changes and sackings are taking place in last 2 years?
8) Isnt it time to replace the Sports Minister who knows nothing of cricket and takes credit when we succeed and blames the team when they fail even in a single match as he did when we lost in SA and at MCG.
9) Lorgat was paid in the millions and what is happening?
10) Sports Minister loud mouthed about split captaincy wihout knowing why other countries do it.

SLC please clean the Augean stables and you will earn the plauuadits of the public if you
1) Remove the corrupt Nishantha
2) Appeal to the Sports minister to resign as he has no knowledge of any sport.
3) Hold the AGM without political influence.

One has to read comments in onlines criticising both SLC and the players to know the dicontent among the public

Remedial action must be taken by SLC, in having efficient and competent officials without a one man show. If not you are locking the stable door after horse has bolted.

Ranjan Rodrigo Sydney

Sanjeev Bernard Fernando's picture
Member since:
25 January 2013
Last activity:
6 days 23 hours

Thanks Ranjan for your kind words...

Theekshana Somaratna's picture
Member since:
14 April 2012
Last activity:
4 years 25 weeks

good stuff machan.this has become a very emotional topic. and you had to compare SLC to Apple (is it still the most valuable co in the world ) :)

Sanjeev Bernard Fernando's picture
Member since:
25 January 2013
Last activity:
6 days 23 hours

hahahahaha...See Theekshana,I think our players are as good as Apple's products :) that might have been the thought process....I wrote this in an hour, from the time I thought of writing to posting, and closer to mid-night :) Must have beeen dreaming :)...Next morning I noticed that Hilal seemed to have had a similar dream lol...

Ravana's picture
Member since:
8 July 2010
Last activity:
7 weeks 16 hours

Apple is not run by retired cricketers' they have QUALIFIED and experienced managers. There is no point expecting a horse to fly !

The crux of the matter is that professional managers with international experience should have been recruited to run an instituion that handles so much money and indeed the expectations of so many people.

It is impossibble because no self respecting professional will work under conditions like those at SLC.

We should be grateful to the few CLEAN members of SLC who have tried their best. The crooks should be named once and for all.

I object to blanket condemnation and expecting miracles !

Sanjeev Bernard Fernando's picture
Member since:
25 January 2013
Last activity:
6 days 23 hours

Ravana - Apple was not sued for anything else but simply as an example of how a company with a great product cannot go under... :)
Perhaps it was a poor example, I realize now :)

I also was trying to say that the forces guiding SLC is the problem and that force of course we all know are our politicians. I think former cricketers who mean well can get this job done, like in other countries....It is the politicians who have ruined it for us. It is them, politicians who run cricket today. Nishantha is the man to make sure the people behind the 'force' gets what they want.

I think unless we have a good leader (president) who is willing to stand up against corruption and is not going to turn a blind eye to his sons and croines stealing from the people, we'd always be in this mess....

Post new comment

All anonymous comments are moderated.
  • Avoid abusive remarks and personal attacks.
  • Avoid posting unrelated links.
  • Avoid vulgar or obscene language.
Already a member? Log-in now. Not a member? Sign up for a new account.
This step helps us prevent automated submissions from spammers.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.