No Sri Lankans in 2016 WT20 Team of the Tournament

Comments

delan82's picture
Member since:
18 October 2009
Last activity:
1 day 7 hours

Not surprising no Sri Lankans. Very few had consistent tournaments often one off performances. Maybe Vandersay was most consistent.

Overall okay team. Naibi and Rashid Khan unlucky to miss out.
Couple more 50s from Shazhad or Sharjeel and they may have got openers spot.

I would have placed Mustafizur ahead of Nehra. Given the tournament was more prominent for spinners than pacemen and already a couple of allrounders who bowl pace prob could have picked another spinner instead of paceman.

Sithum Sam's picture

This team is fully bogus, I can agree on having no Sri Lankans, But I believe Angelo Mathews is way better than Nehra. but c'mon DeCock, Satner, Willey & Nehra.

DJ Bravo for David Willey
Mohammed Aamir for Nehra
Shakib Al Hassan for Satner
Angelo Matthews for Shane Watson
Mohammad Shahzad (Afghanistan) for Quinton Decock

Jeewantha's picture
Member since:
7 March 2016
Last activity:
6 hours 39 sec

Nabi or Shakib in for Watson

suranga indrajith's picture

mathews or corey anderson for watson

Stormy's picture
Member since:
15 January 2011
Last activity:
1 min 14 sec

How far have Eng come in limited overs cricket since the last WC. No Cook, Broad and Jimmy all world class test performers. India major dissappointment with all those t20 stars couldnt do more and same for Australia.

TRUE CLASS's picture

WHY NOT THEY HAVE NT INCLUDED THE " HIGHLY TALENTED " CHANDIMAL N THIRIMANNE.. THEY DESERVE TO WALK INTO ANY TEAM IN THE WORLD EVEN THEY DONT SCORE BECAUSE THE ARE "TECHNICALLY CORRECT" ACCORDING TO ARAVINDA .

Post new comment

Note
All anonymous comments are moderated.
  • Avoid abusive remarks and personal attacks.
  • Avoid posting unrelated links.
  • Avoid vulgar or obscene language.
Already a member? Log-in now. Not a member? Sign up for a new account.
CAPTCHA
This step helps us prevent automated submissions from spammers.
1 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.