Why in-form senior pro Tharanga wasn't selected in Tests, while undeserved favorites granted both formats?

Some blog posts contain unedited fan-submitted content — Create an account to start your own blog

Slow going mismatch Chandimal is automatically selected for ODIs despite repeated failures in Odis & in domestic Super-4 (4-day 18 Av/ List-A 1.0 Av)... !!!
 
Chandimal in Odis Since Jan 2017:
 
20 odis - 18 ings - 400 runs - 23 Average - 61 STRIKE RATE..!

Obviously, Chandimal was one of the biggest reasons for loosing so many ODIs during 2017.
 
Injury prone Mathews is automatically selected to Tests despite doing nothing in recent times in domestic cricket to get selected (super 4 tournament - 4-day 14 Av / List A  24 Av) & Mathews was a  total failure in Tests during past 2 years -
 
Angelo Mathews in Tests since May 2016:
 
15 Tests - 29  ings - 860 runs @ 29 Average ...!!!!
 
On the other hand, Upul Tharanga had specifically asked for just 6 months break from Tests  (September 4, 2017) to concentrate on responsibilities as skipper in Odis & T20s during his brief tenure as skipper in mid-2017. Those Six months is well exceeded now and he is available for selections. Tharanga had done much better than Mathews in Tests in past 2 years, despite getting some brief opportunities scattered allover batting order (No 2-7) , unsettling his usual batting rhythm as a front order specialist;

Upul Tharanga in Tests since May 2016:

10 Tests -  20 ings -  637 runs @ 36 Average.
 
But only their personal favorites (like Chandimal, Mathews etc) backing selectors (Graeme Labrooy & coach Hathurusinghe), totally ignored the most in-form experienced senior batter Upul Tharanga, despite continuing his excellent form from 2017 (one of the 3 batters in the world who topped 1,000 odi runs in 2017).

Even In recent domestic Super-4 tournaments, coastal village-school originated Tharanga was the ONLY front order batter among SL's current international batters, who made tons in both formats. But obviously he was ignored again by the Colombo-originates backing selectors, who always readily grant automatic selections to some of their Colombo based buddies across all formats, with nil performances in recent times to justify their spots in those formats (this partiality in selections was clearly pointed out in above examples).  

If SL is seriously thinking of salvaging the already ruined international Cricket, they have to stop this idiotic, double-standard, merit-less policy at least now. They should select players purely according to current form plus proven abilities & experience, without any bias placed on their origin or favoritism.  

SL cannot afford to select name sake baggage carriers automatically any longer.  If they cannot justify their spots with acceptable overall accomplishments / productivity shown during past 12 months or longer at international level, in appropriate format.... at least they should be able to come up with some exceptional performances in domestic scene to earn back their spots. Otherwise, automatic spots should never be readily granted to such failures forever, as seen with Mathews & Chandimal, no matter how senior they are. Lack of fitness makes this unethical absurdity even worse!   

As usual,  the Colombo backing selectors' repeated ignorance & blind-eyed reluctance to recognize this "out-of-hub" originated front order batter's current form, vast experience & abilities.... is killing the essence of any impartial selection criteria. The truth of the matter is;  if Tharanga was lucky enough to bloom from a city school, he would have never faced those historically long cruel pauses, virtually stalled his prime career beyond 3 year in Odis (2013-2016)  & 7 years (2007- 2014) in Tests and today he should have made over 10 k runs with plenty of tons, beating most in each format to be among the top class batters!  

Why do they still promote this despicable double-standard policy, if really thinking about salvaging SL cricket?

Recognize every senior player's achievements or failures on equal terms on a common scale for National Squad representation, without discriminating on territorial bias.! 

 

Comments

Anonymous's picture

This is the bitter truth naked to levelheaded general public. But never willing admit or change by some city soles at the helm of SLC administration. They consider only the products of elite city schools as the pillars of success, irrespective of repeated failures. Selectors provide limitless chances to their personal cronies, while overlooking/ruining much productive players hailed from anywhere else. That's why even such a senior player like Tharanga was never treated fairly even after a decade long seniority, despite his superb form & continuous run making for SL.

Andrew Silva's picture
Member since:
15 February 2015
Last activity:
1 week 3 days

Latest News:

Privileged Mathews, Chandimal, Dimuth (all 3 batters from Colombo's inner circle) and bowlers Herath /Lakmal (luckily no competitors from Colombo circle) were given category A contracts, while SLC's stepchild BATTER hailed from elsewhere(Tharanga)was given only a B contract, despite his equal or more valuable contributions to SL in past year.

What kind of standardization is this? How can anyone justify this double standard, highly bias treatment?

Chandimal in 2017: 20 odis - 400 runs - 23 Av - 61 SR was one of the clear culprits responsible for dooming so many Odis during past year. Yet he got A category purely on Tests.

Mathews was a total failure in Tests during past 2 yrs:
15 Tests - 29 ings - 860 runs@ 29 Av. What had he done in past year to grant Category A ? When was the last time he won a MoM award?

Dimuth K was given Category A purely on his Test performances; topping 1,000 Test runs in 2017 (as Upul Tharanga did in Odis)

But Tharanga's much harder & significantly unique achievement was not recognized in equal terms as usual to reward him fairly. Why?

Upul Tharanga was one of the only 3 odi players in world cricket to make over 1,000 runs in 2017 (25 odis -1,011 runs - 48 Av - 92 SR - 2x100+ / 6 x 50+ his hundreds against SA & Pak & a 95 Vs India). He made those valuable runs for SL single-handedly, while rest in the team, miserably failed even to come close with their bats to salvage SL in many Odis. Upul even created a SL Odi record carrying his bat throughout an inning Vs Pak trying hard to win a match, but there was not a single batter capable of remaining at the end to support him to make those few runs needed to win.! This was the story in 4th Odi in SA, where UT made 119 from 90 balls @ 132 SR Vs SA in Capetown.!

No matter how you look at it, none can deny the fact obvious to anyone. This latest misdoing proves the point I have stressed in this blog.

(Last edited by Andrew Silva on May 22, 2018 - 10:31)
Stormy's picture
Member since:
15 January 2011
Last activity:
8 hours 18 min

Not sure I agree with the Chandi/Anji bashing going on here, firstly, isn't Chandi from down South? Regardless, someone has to lead the test team and Chandi's test credentials are no longer up for discussion. The issue here is Anji who is limping in and out of the team and captaincy which is making everything difficult.

I assume we can get past the debate that Anji could and should be our number one batter but as the writer points out, his form in the last two years is of serious concern. This was the guy who was supposed to step up but he has hardly made the park let alone make runs.

I too agree that Chandi should not be in the limited over team but then who should lead it in Anji's absence? I for one would take this opportunity to give the leadership role to a young chap but we so reluctant and caught up in the 'senior' thing hence forced to play Chandi in limited overs cricket.

Upul is a plan but a plan that was tested and failed spectacularly with a couple of 5-0 loses! Also I feel Upul is only a stop gap and now we are passed that stage and need a permanent solution hence my call for a younger option with the idea it's a move for the future.

Andrew Silva's picture
Member since:
15 February 2015
Last activity:
1 week 3 days

@Stormy; Yes Chandi is from down south from the same village as Tharanga but the only difference is Chandi moved to Ananda accepting the request, but Tharanga's mistake was he refused to accept the invitation and move to Colombo/change his school, as he clearly stated in one of his media interviews. As I said, if he had made that move, he wouldn't have ever faced those historically long cruel pauses, virtually stalled his prime career beyond 3 year in Odis (2013-2016) & 7 years (2007- 2014) in Tests & today he should have made over 10 k runs with plenty of tons, beating most in each format to be among the top class batters!

My article was not regarding the stripping of his captaincy but the continuous overlooking of him from a well deserved spot in test squads.

He is better-off not leading a side incapable to support his efforts(some bowlers like Lakmal, Malinga etc inexplicably taking 6-7 minutes to complete an over & with a batting unit comprised of bottle-necks like Chandimal - Pk series: 5 odis -41 runs @ 8 av- 47 SR (Mendis- 2 odis-12 runs @ 6 av - 37 SR/ MilindhaS - 5 odis - 13 runs @ 4 av- 43 SR/ Thisara - 5 odis - 91 runs @ 18 av) crumbling well under 50 overs..... those sins of others resulted UT to face unfortunate match-banned + monetary penalization and 5-0 series losses!

But as usual the blind followers of SL cricket, with zero analytical viewpoint (including some local media) easily find the SLC's deliberate scapegoat Tharanga to blame.!

5-0 whitewash Vs Pk, Tharanga scored 199 runs @ 50 Av- with an unbeaten 112* & 61. But the SL's batting failures given to him among top 7 batters in the order, collectively managed just 248 runs from 25 ings @ 9.92 Av.! Even a canny skipper like Ricky Ponting wouldn't have survived under such circumstances.

SO WHOM TO BE BLAMED for those whitewashes?

As I pointed out, both 5-0 losses would have been easily avoided, if there were some genuinely talented front/middle order batters in the squads given to him, capable enough to face those situations & support UT's single handed century making efforts to pullout wins. But they all crumbled out well under 50 overs, short of a few runs to make those wins (especially in 4th odi vs SA/ 2nd Odi Vs Pk).

SLC had now proudly re-appointed their darling skipper Mathews(totally forgetting how he doomed more than 80% of his consecutive series across all formats from 2015-2017, including the historicaly humiliating home-series defeat suffered Vs minnow Zmb in 2017.... to lead the nation, to his 4th straight GLOBAL-STAGE, white-ball Humiliation in upcoming 2019-WC!

Now back to unjustly overlooking of Tharanga in Tests....

Since recalled for Tests, in 2014 after 7-yrs Tharanga was limited to 16 randomly given tests. Despite that, his 32 innings yielded 1,041 runs @ 35 av with 2 x100+ & 5 x 50+ (including consecutive scores of 92,45,46,48 Vs Pak despite facing a yearlong in-between layoff & missing another ton vs SA by 16 runs).

Since recalled in 2014 after 7yrs, He ONLY failed consecutively in last two tests vs India in 2017 series, to make any impact (during his brief tenure as white-ball skipper handling more responsibilities, which prompted him to seek a 6-months brief break from tests to focus on that).

Up to that 2nd Test vs India in Aug 2017 since recalled for his 2nd phase of test career after 7 yrs in Nov 2014,

Upul Tharnga: 28 Test innings yielded 1,027 runs @ 40 av with 2 x 100+ / 5 x 50+

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/...

- Isn't this one of the MOST Progressively Productive Test batting performance seen from a SL player during past 3 years?

- Isn't this senior pro front order batter, currently in immaculate batting form topping 1k runs in 2017 & being the only SL international player succeeded in making tons in both formats of recent Super-4 PT?

- if they can gamble any further with physically unfit, rapidly declining failure like Mathews (past 2 yrs: 15 Tests - 29 ings - 860 runs @ 29 Av), why much more assertive, experienced Tharanga was overlooked again after such an impressive batting record to back him in regaining his well deserved test spot?

(Last edited by Andrew Silva on May 26, 2018 - 11:53)
Andrew Silva's picture
Member since:
15 February 2015
Last activity:
1 week 3 days

Does, he really deserved to be treated as a stop gap-player after all those years of hard work & impressive progress in all departments... despite facing extremely harsh treatment... yet constantly producing big runs for nation SL ?

Even his ground fielding (cutting off so many boundaries) & catching were vastly improved in recent times; ie: after Upul Tharanga's 2 catches in the final odi in recent BD series, made him taking a record equaling SEVEN x Catches in that 5-odi series (2 in in final + 1 in 4th Odi, + 3 in 3rd Odi & 1 in 1st odi). This is the highest number of catches taken by a SL fielder in a 5-odi series (Only RS Mahanama had achieved a similar fielding record in 1997, 21 yrs ago).

- Tharanga also equaled the Highest number of Catches (3) taken by a SL fielder in an ODI inning, in the previous match Vs Zmb.

Some of them were very hard spectacular catches(among the best)praised by foreign commentators. Yet, some local horned-heads who never willing to appreciate those, readily pick such occasional spill (even common to the very best)to blame/criticize him over many moons to come(when unable to find any other means to let him down).

Note: found the following stats about SLCS's "ever-green" buddy skipper Mathews the great. You are free to take it as a compliment/ bashing or absolute reality, according to your sweetly focused mindset :)

Mathew’s overall Record 2015/16 &17: Total Series 26 / Lost 22/ Won 3/ Drew 1. – Under Mathews: SL LOST 85 % of his series / Won just 11% & Drew 4%

(Last edited by Andrew Silva on May 26, 2018 - 13:28)
Andrew Silva's picture
Member since:
15 February 2015
Last activity:
1 week 3 days

Same humbug critics relentlessly blamed me for talking about Tharanga's unjustly total elimination from odis since 2013-2016 at the age of 28 yrs, just to accommodate useless buddies in odis as openers (ie: considered even an odi failures like DimuthK over UT to open in NZ & even 2015-WC resulting in total flops).

See how well Tharanga had done (1k+ runs @ near 50 av- 93 SR) since getting regular, consistent odi opportunities since 2017.

The simple truth is; even the very best batter in the world wouldn't be able to survive without having a decent window of consistent opportunities to build up his rhythm..!

If SLC can give constant places despite many years of constant failures yielding empty bucket of runs at insanely low averages in 20s (for buddies like; Thirimanne, Kaushal Silva/Dimuth K & even KJP who constantly failed with record number of single-digit scores from 2013-2016/ Mathews in tests during past 2 yrs).....

Why can't they open the same door to progressively improving (statistically proven) wide experienced, well in-form senior assert like Tharanga in Test arena? The difference is, he doesn't belong to Colombo's famous inner-circle.!

(Last edited by Andrew Silva on May 26, 2018 - 14:11)
Stormy's picture
Member since:
15 January 2011
Last activity:
8 hours 18 min

@Andrew Silva point taken! Not that my opinion matters but you make a valid point and I know your passionate about the Tharanga matter - good on you! Whether the rest of us like it or not you certainly make a point. I am not a great Tharanga fan but regardless I also couldn't work out why they dropped him after his comeback series against SA some time back. He did well but we dropped him for the NZ tour. Also noted that he makes a lot of runs both at A team level and first class cricket but we somehow can't fit him in consistently. Even I am down to calling him a 'stop gap' solution but this is because that's what SLC have made him. It does beg the question, why don't we just stick with him and see what happens. It's not like there a line up of talented guys waiting in the wings. Also he is a true career opener so we must bat him as an opener and not all over the place!

Andrew Silva's picture
Member since:
15 February 2015
Last activity:
1 week 3 days

@Stormy; It's heartening to see at least one person in IC forums, got the balanced mind /intelligence to understand my factual analytical viewpoint. Most of all, thanks for being modest enough to admit the obvious flaws in our system.

As I have said before in many times, I am not writing these facts to promote any individual, as majority today (who measure everything according to personal bias) conveniently assume here! I truly love SL cricket & can't tolerate any form of unjustly discrimination. That's my nature.

With his bat in 2017, Tharanga completely proved what I have said since 2013 in all those IC blog articles were absolutely right(during his 3+ yrs long layoff).

Also, he point-blankly proved all those "critics" insulted me in various ways were completely wrong!

Unlike in the West, in SL society, it is very easy to fabricate, propagate & implant wrong impressions through local media & other means of various actions. This is because most of our people have very short memory & zero analytical-view point. Therefore, highly gullible to swallow any junk-notion systematically spread over time. SLC hierarchy is very good at it.

Therefore, it is pretty much clear why you used to think UT as a 'stop gap' solution & certainly you are not alone. There maybe hundreds of thousands more thinking the same way, thanks to SLC's hidden agendas, systematically propagated to alter the minds of our people.

As you said, Upul had made lots of runs in A -team as well without being recognized his outstanding performances for selection. Ie: in 2014 SL-A Vs England Lions in SL unofficial Test Series, Tharanga made back-to-back 2x100+ as skipper (295 runs @ 59 Av), yet he was sadly denied a well deserved place, hard-earned by merit for the Eng tour came later in that year. What justice was that?

I appreciate your courage & having a back-born to standup against the tide of wrongdoers, who blindly endorse injustice.

This is the duty of a true well-wisher of SL cricket.

You said, "Why don't we just stick with him and see what happens?".

This is the exact point I have been stressing all these years!

(Last edited by Andrew Silva on May 27, 2018 - 11:02)
Jamis Banda's picture

Andrew silva alias warnaweera aka see through aka mdk Julius ceaser, I did mention earlier that you need to see a ophthalmologist. I admit I was wrong in assuming that you only have myopia. Its far worse than I thought you need to see a psychiatrist and a psychologist and a ophthalmologist. You need to do something about this machan. you are in a wrong space and you need help. Having read your constant written ramblings about UT I am convinced what you have is serious mental issues.

What causes Obsessive love(UT)?

The process that mental-health professionals engage in to assess obsessive love includes evaluating the person to ensure that mental disorders that may present with this symptom are considered and treated if present. Examples of some such disorders include schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, delusional disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, a personality disorder, or organic (caused by a medical condition) brain syndrome. Warning signs that someone is suffering from obsessive love may include the following:

•Low self-esteem/a tendency of needing excessive reassurance
•Obsessively talking/writing about their loved object (UT)
•Making repeated calls, texts, and/or faxes to the love object
•Unwanted intensive attention to the love(UT) object
•A tendency to have extremely good (not balanced) feelings about the love object
•A tendency to focus on only the positive aspects of their loved one
•Abusing other who have opposite view of his love object
•Excessive joy, to the point of relief, when talking about love object and excessive anger when the love object being call to question by others

You need help. I am not being sarcastic. Seriously you need to do something about your mental state. How can one person so obsessed with a player? you are not talking about a Bradman but you are constantly (7 days of the week)talking about an average joe.

I am sorry to call you a pissa.

Andrew Silva's picture
Member since:
15 February 2015
Last activity:
1 week 3 days

Schizophrenia is a serious brain disorder that distorts the way a person thinks, acts, expresses emotions, perceives reality, and relates to others.!

All the Unmistakable signs of an uncommunicative, aloof unfortunate schizophrenic have been precisely demonstrated in this thread by a poster named Banda @ #9 on May 27,20:45.
such as;

- insulting
- abusing
- thinking of themselves as psychic (to label others as one)
- being suspicious /paranoid
- distorted perceptions
- unable to perceive reality
- refuse & misinterpret factual reality
- odd beliefs/magical thinking
- strange way of acting /expressing emotion
- awkward behavior in social exposure when relating to others

It's quite evident, this pitiful sole (shows 100% of the above symptoms)is unable to come up with any objective criticism related to the subject of discussion that he hates. But desperately trying to stop it with other means... with a completely distorted mind, compatible to the symptoms of his unfortunate mental illness.

Also, it's a well-known fact that a real "Pissa" never admits that he has that illness & always think/call other as "Pissa"

So keep calling me in various names as you wish, I have no hard feelings but I feel pity for you.!

(Last edited by Andrew Silva on May 29, 2018 - 10:27)

Post new comment

Note
All anonymous comments are moderated.
  • Avoid abusive remarks and personal attacks.
  • Avoid posting unrelated links.
  • Avoid vulgar or obscene language.
Already a member? Log-in now. Not a member? Sign up for a new account.
CAPTCHA
This step helps us prevent automated submissions from spammers.
1 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.