'Nishantha's reign has been catastrophic for Sri Lankan cricket'

Former team manager reveals all in explosive interview
By Hilal Suhaib | October 22, 2013

Earlier this year, Charith Senanayake was removed from his position as team manager over incidents that took place while the national team was on tour in Australia. Senanayake spoke to Island Cricket in an exclusive interview this week to discuss the circumstances behind his removal and the current state of affairs at the cricket board.

Photo
Charith Senanayake played Test and ODI cricket for Sri Lanka in the early 90s. © Island Cricket

How did your relationship with SLC sour?

Firstly, I must stress that I have nothing personal against Nishantha Ranatunga or any other individual. I am merely disclosing exactly what happened in order to clear my name, as I was framed as the bad guy. I am only the fall guy.

Before being the team manager, I was head of marketing at SLC. I was responsible for securing sponsorships, TV tenders and other revenue-earning ventures for SLC. My goal was only to ensure that the cricket board received the best deal, whilst protecting the SLC brand and increasing its value. I was never reluctant or afraid to point out any agreements or deals that would have a negative impact on the organisation, but that may not have suited some elements within SLC. After having secured many deals for SLC, including the Mobitel, Reebok and CEAT sponsorships to name a few, I was strangely removed from my post, which I believe was done because I had pointed out some lapses just before the 2011 World Cup to the board and the negative impact it could have.

After Mahela [Jayawardene] was reappointed as captain, my name was proposed as team manager because I had worked with Mahela and the team when we last beat India in a Test series in Sri Lanka. Nishantha, the secretary of SLC, initially opposed my appointment, but the decision was apparently voted 6-1 in my favour at the executive committee meeting. He even brought this to the notice of the sports minister, trying to stall the appointment. To his dismay, the executive committee decided to stand by their decision at that stage. From that point onwards, he was waiting for any opportunity to get rid of me.

When I returned to Sri Lanka with the team after the tour of Australia earlier this year, I was immediately suspended over what they claimed was a breach of contract. The main charge against me was that I had interacted with the media directly while on tour in Australia, but the story begins well before the Australian tour.

During the first Test in Galle against New Zealand in November 2012, the then skipper Mahela, in front of me, asked Nishantha to help some of the senior players disburse funds owing to them from the ICC to support staff who had helped the team during the 2011 World Cup campaign. Nishantha then asked Mahela to send him all the details and the list of beneficiaries. The players had decided they wanted to reward support staff with funds the ICC owed them. They named the support staff who were with them right throughout the World Cup campaign, including ground staff and curators. This was not SLC money, it was the players' money.

Mahela personally handed a letter with the list of names of the beneficiaries to SLC's accounts division, with Nishantha's knowledge. This letter was leaked to the media during an important Test series in Australia. The players were made to look bad with incorrect information, and they felt that they were being disgraced. Mahela, on behalf of the team, then wanted to respond to the paper over the allegations with a clarification since SLC refused to investigate, mediate, resolve the matter or assist the team.

PhotoAn article published in the Daily Mirror newspaper was well timed to disgrace the players just before the Boxing Day Test. It was very demoralizing for the players. I am fully convinced that it was someone from the executive committee that leaked the letter to bring disrepute to the team and the country. The person responsible should be found someday and action must be taken. Instead, they suspended me and swept the issue under the carpet.

The moral of the team was low due to this, and their focus was on these off-field events. I feared that they will lose perspective on the field. I wanted to defuse the situation. Since the team had no other option to express their views or clear their names, the team collectively sought my assistance in contacting the media. Providing Mahela my e-mail facilities, whilst the team was on tour, to respond to these damaging claims made as a result of SLC leaking confidential information to the press, is one of the reasons for my removal. Had the letter not been leaked in the first place, there would not have been any need for clarification. My only involvement was to allow Mahela to use my e-mail account to send the clarification to the paper, when the team was in transit from Hobart to Melbourne after the first Test.

I can confirm that Nishantha initially agreed to take care of the matter for the players. But later, he, together with some members of the SLC executive committee, let the team down badly by rejecting the players' request to pay support staff. They made all sorts of spurious claims to the media about why they rejected it. SLC, perhaps desperate for funds, may have wanted to keep it in their account as long as possible. The whole thing was beautifully orchestrated.

The paper that received the leaked letter portrayed the players as traitors before an important Test match, and the players were pretty emotional. They felt let down. The support staff on the list were faced with various allegations after the article. People claimed they were taking bribes from players, and they were ridiculed. Based on what transpired, players had every right to express their side of the story, but were deprived. Perhaps I was wrong in allowing the team to use my email account, but in my view, it was the best thing to do at that point to bring the situation under control, and give the players some peace of mind.

Apart from that, SLC also claimed that I did not show up for work after the tour, which is a total lie. I had applied for leave before the tour was over, and it was approved by Ashley de Silva, who was the head of operations at the time. The final charge against me was over a misdirected SMS to Nishantha, calling him names which are not printable. All charges were dropped after the initial disciplinary hearing, but a new manager was appointed before the proceedings ended. Their only goal was to remove me over bogus allegations and appoint someone who would happily toe the line.

Who gained from your removal?

I did not write the letter to the press or provide any information to the press. I only allowed the players to use my e-mail service, and they contacted the media with a clarification. They could not take action against Mahela and the whole team. I have good reason to believe that they chucked me out because it was the perfect opportunity to reward the person that dropped out of the last SLC election to allow Nishantha to win uncontested. That individual is now the team manager. With my removal, Nishantha has the team manager, some of the coaches, selectors — all his right-hand men — in place to control things the way he wants. I was a thorn in his side. I was an obstacle.

What do you think of SLC elections?

It's not free and fair, and it's politically influenced and manipulated. How can such a key position like the secretary's post go uncontested? It is true that you do need the support of the government for SLC to function because of the Sports Law, as it supersedes SLC's constitution and other sporting establishments' constitutions, but the entire process is influenced by politics at present, which is detrimental to our cricket and all sports.

There has to be a democratic process. This has been violated greatly. Politicians place individuals who they feel they can trust, but those individuals end up damaging the reputation of the politicians who back them because they are not qualified nor skilled to hold such important posts. I don't think the politicians realise that these people also want to fulfil their own personal agendas, and they will eventually take them for a ride too. You need qualified people genuinely committed to the betterment of our cricket, not goons with hidden agendas. I don't think even the current SLC chairman knows of what is happening behind his own back. Most of the officials are there just to fill a post. The government must assist in bringing in a truly democratic process for elections, as well as a professional corporate governance structure without undue influence from outside entities. The public are outraged, and the fans are now finally fed up. There is even a petition being circulated, which hasn't happened before.

Some claim that SLC is a one-man show run by the secretary, do you agree?

Yes, it is a one-man show. It's Nishantha's way or the highway. Just see how SLC is bankrupt under his tenure. The 2011 World Cup was a huge loss. The SLPL was a disaster under his watch. SLC handed broadcast rights to CSN when Nishantha was CEO of CSN, which shows us the level of governance at present. All this makes you wonder if the deals and contracts signed, and the agreements SLC gets into, are for the benefit of officials and their personal financial interests, or for the benefit of cricket in Sri Lanka. Nishantha's reign has been catastrophic for Sri Lankan cricket as a whole.

What do you think of the SLPL fiasco?

The public may not be aware of this, but the concept of SLPL was my idea when I was head of marketing at SLC. I proposed this to supplement SLC's income, and my proposal included SLC having full control of the tournament. What they ended up doing was to hand the entire tournament to an outside party [Somerset Entertainment Ventures], including marketing rights, with nothing much left for SLC. The whole bidding process was questionable, but it was pushed through mainly due to the influence of a very powerful person.

Related
SLC to probe Jayawardene's comments to newspaper
I have lost confidence in SLC: Mahela
SLC rejects Mahela request

© Island Cricket

Comments

Asela Jayaweera's picture

We hope that more people are brave like Charith to speak out and expose what is happening. The public has the right to know. These types of interviews actually do a great service for our cricket because it puts pressure on the corrupt officials and makes the nation aware of wrongdoings.

DS's picture

One day we will find out who ordered four changes to the team for the World Cup final in 2011. Why Aravinda quit as chairman selection committee and why Sangakkara quit as captain after 2011 World Cup.

Marcian's picture
Member since:
8 December 2010
Last activity:
36 weeks 2 hours

Nishantha Ranatunge is the blue-eyed boy of you know who - anyone who swears allegiance to him can do whatever they want and get away with it. Law of the land!

samitha's picture

michael de zoysa is a shameless fellow!

Mahesh Kannangara's picture

Just see the kind of unnecessary stress our players have to cope with! We have talent in this country but unless we have proper administrators we will be hindered all the way!

Charith Senanayake's picture

Dear Mr.Ravana,(is that your real name? I wonder....) I believe you are one of those who call themselves, intellectuals with a chip on the shoulders,goes around calling all others fools. Nevertheless, I did what I thought was right mainly to clear my name as some were casting serious doubts about my sacking. However, why don't you tell us uneducated, what's best for Sri Lanka cricket? If you need to get in touch with me or meet me, please ask Admins for my details. I would love to discuss matters with you over a drink perhaps (provided you drink)& teach you how to behave in public....Cheers

Lalith Gunaratna's picture

Michael who? As the new manager.

I totally believe what Charith has stated. We live in an era where the powerful can do anything so that matters are handled the way like them to be.

We must now see how Nishantha is so powerful so as to make some members of the executive committee, the selection committee and some others mere puppets on strings controlled by him.

First of all, we have a Sports Minister who may have played softball cricket in his home town, acting like a bull in a china shop, selecting his catchers for various posts. Then comes Nishantha. He gets his men.

Then, we have the biggest puppets at the top, duly appointed by the Minister. I guess, merely because of the fear in appointing somebody like Arjuna as the head of SLC. That won't happen as Arjuna will expose all the rogues there.

On top of all that, they want our cricketers to go out there and beat all other National teams without a problem.

Political influence can get a mediocre cricketer into the National Team and the selectors have the audacity to justify their selections, knowing very well that they are wrong.

Sigh!!

Stormy's picture
Member since:
15 January 2011
Last activity:
2 days 13 hours

If this is actually Charith Senanayake what a pleasure to know that someone from SLC (ok ex) is actually keeping tabs on what the fans (most us that is, except the few fanatics!) are saying. I know we the fans don't really count in the eyes of SLC but if there are no fans there is no game!

As for Charith, if you take note of the comments, I think it's clear where most of us stand on the matter and its great to have your on board and please continue to part of the forum. Would be great to have input from a real cricketer.

Anonymous's picture

Ravana – I have to disagree with your point of view.

First of all, we need people to come forward and speak up, stand up for what is right. That is what Arjuna does and we love him for that, don’t we?. If these claims are not true, then SLC can respond appropriately.

I also don’t agree with you comparing anyone to Nishantha. Anyone who follows cricket in SL knows that Nishantha is simply peerless!!!!

Let’s look at a summary of his accomplishments; 1. Secretary of SLC during a period in which SLC went bankrupt 2. Accepted the post of Secretary while still being the CEO of CSN and arranged for (using similar tactics that gets him elected uncontested) CSN to get local TV rights for SLC 3. Remained secretary while such disgraceful events as the disappearance of SLC computer hard drive happened when SLC was under investigation for corruption 4. Was the Secretary when the most successful local coach, Hathurusinghe, was unceremoniously fired for lame excuses just to make room for favorites 5. Was the Secretary when the now famous Suraj Dandeniya was appointed with no qualifications to run world cup preparations just because he happened to visit SLC with lunch for his uncle DS lol 6. Was Secretary under who’s tenure that SLC wasted so much money building grounds we did not need, where no ordinary man could go 7. Was Secretary during the period where our best cricketers were publicly humiliated by SLC 8. Was the secretary who is so good no one would even consider running against him in an election 9. Is the Secretary of SLC and now president of Colts cricket and is now questioned about transporting SLC belongings to Colts...

The list is too long. The bottom line is that Nishantha is peerless and shameless and no one else can be compared to him! How he can get up in the morning and leave his house wearing clothes, after what has happened to SLC under him, is something only he can explain....

Charith Senanayake's picture

Hi Stormy, yes it's me. I have nothing to hide. During my tenure as Manager, I did all I could do to keep in touch with the fans. Some who are close to me provided valuable advise and insights during that period & I am thankful to them. Actually switching of captains during the T20 WC was also a crazy thought from an ardent fan which I latched on to. Yes, will try to be in touch & give my input as much as possible. I am a firm believer that there's no sport without fans & spectators. Please continue to share your positive thought process. Believe me, it is beneficial. People are reading your comments. Good luck to you all. Cheers

Post new comment

Note
All anonymous comments are moderated.
  • Avoid abusive remarks and personal attacks.
  • Avoid posting unrelated links.
  • Avoid vulgar or obscene language.
Already a member? Log-in now. Not a member? Sign up for a new account.
CAPTCHA
This step helps us prevent automated submissions from spammers.
2 + 14 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.